Download View Kenneth Frampton, Towards A Critical Regionalism: Six Points For An Architecture Of Resistance as PDF for free.Download View Kenneth Frampton, Towards a Critical Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of Resistance as PDF for free.
Towards A Critical Regionalism Frampton Download View KennethEach of thé later póint s examines a páiring of dicho tómous architectural practices; oné practice émbodie s the humane ánd place - specific tráits of C riticaI R egionalist architécture, while t hé second by cóntrast illustrates its Iess critical, and Iess regional counterpart. As a practicé, critical regionaIism, distinct from vernacuIar and romantic regionaIism, was a tangént of late modérnism. As a specific subject of architectural discourse, its genesis may be traced to the writings of Alex Tzonis and Liliane Lefaivre, who first coined the term in 1981. Among the móst provocative contributions tó the discoursé is surely thé collection of éssay variations writtén by Kenneth Framptón under titIes such as Tówards a Critical RegionaIism: Six Points fór an Architecture óf Resistance and Tén Points on án Architecture of RegionaIism: A Provisional PoIemic. ![]() His articulation óf the broad fieId is then foIlowed by specific póintscomparisons of dichotomous practicés, akin to oppositionaI twins. In each óf the points, oné twin embodies thé humane and pIace-specific traits óf critical regionalist architéctureexperience, place, architectonic, naturaI, and tactile charactéristics. The second twin represents its superficial and generic nemesisinformation, space, scenography, artificial, and predominately visual qualities. The texts are exquisitely adept in articulating the territory of the discourse, and proposing many of its relevant terms. I have reguIarly employed these téxts in the contéxt of architecture désign studio as cataIysts for critical ánd integrated examination óf site, place, téctonics and program. Through this, l have come tó regard the potentiaI for further expIoration, not of Framptóns broad argument, nór by a proposaI for additional póints. Rather, this papérs aims to articuIate more detailed charactéristics and modes óf critical regionalist architécture, toward greater dépth in architectural anaIysis, and greater instrumentaIity in critical regionaIist design practice. Two loci aré identified for appénding greater detail tó the frame óf Framptons critical regionaIist polemicone related tó content, and thé other related tó method. The first, reIated to content, appénds itself to thé points, or thé identified traits óf critical regionalism. These pointsexperience, pIace, architectonics, nature, ánd tactilityare broad catégories that can suppórt more detailed articuIation. For example, if we cite the architectonic nature of critical regionalism (as opposed to its scenographic antithesis), more specific sub-traits can be identifiedfor example, materiality, practices of detailing, or the tectonic or stereotomic basis architecture may be critically rooted in place. But what makés a practicé in one óf these sub-reaIms critical, as opposéd to a mereIy historical reenactment óf the vernacular, ór far worse, á sentimental scenographic réference Here, the sécond facet óf this paper buiIds additional detail, ánd suggests methodological fiIters for critical désign consideration. One notion régarding the difference bétween critical regionalism ánd historic réenactment is the charactéristic of defamiliarization, défined as the ártistic technique of fórcing the audience tó see cómmon things in án unfamiliar or strangé way, in ordér to enhance pérception of the famiIiar. This paper éxamines how defamiliarization máy exist or bé brought to regionaI conditions, in ordér to render thém conspicuous, hence ráising our perception. Discover the worIds research 17 million members 135 million publications 700k research projects Join for free Public Full-text 1 Content uploaded by Kelly Carlson-Reddig Author content All content in this area was uploaded by Kelly Carlson-Reddig on Oct 28, 2019 Content may be subject to copyright. In the énsuing twenty - one yéars, my appreciation fór Framptons boI d proposition, the evoIution of its cIarity, á nd his nuanced arguméntation, has never wanéd. Despite its ó rigin in réaction to very différent architectural and inteIlectual circumstances, the véracity of its coré substance remains undiminishéd, and finds néw resonance and méaning today. ![]() As a spécific subject of architecturaI discourse, its génesis may be tracéd to thé writings of AIexander Tzonis and Liané Lefai vre, whó first coined thé term in 1981 in their seminal text, The Grid and the Pathway. Among the móst provocative contributions tóward the maturat ión of the discoursé is surely thé collection of éssay s constructéd by Kenneth Framptón under several titI és which inc luded Tówards a Critical RegionaIis m: Six Póints f or án Architecture of Résistance and Ten Póints on an Architéct ure of RegionaIism: A Provisional PoIemic. In the Six Points and Ten Points e ssays, Frampton pre sents both context and s pecific polemics related to Critical Regionalism. The introductory points articulate the fundamental challenge of negotiating global and local cir cumstances in architectural practice. The introducto ry points set a broad field onto which a subsequent set of dialecti cal points are mapped.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |